So, what’s the difference? Invariably, in any such platform all traffic is routed through a single central server. The distinction between end-to-end encryption vs client-to-server encryption is so important that it’s fair to say the two types of platforms are fundamentally different. Prominent examples would include Zoom, Slack, WebEx, Skype for Business, Telegram (in its default setting) and many others. The use of client-to-server architecture is especially prevalent in products that offer video communication. However, many other tools described as “secure” use antiquated client-to-server encryption. Modern products, including Wickr networks, built exclusively with end-to-end encryption provide a new level of data and communication security. The single most important security differentiator between communication platforms is whether they offer end-to-end encryption (E2E) rather than client-to-server encryption (C2S). While encryption is crucial, how it is used makes all the difference in the world. Mission critical data and highly sensitive discussions require secure communication tools that provide stronger encryption than products used for everyday communications.ĭescribing a communication tool as “secure” generally implies that – amongst other things – it protects all communication through encryption and authentication.
This is an especially complex issue in large organizations – both public and private. Conversely, the information we share can create significant risk when we are discussing negotiation tactics, confidential client data, a new business strategy or trade secrets. The things we say and send to each other can hold immense value to us as a business, as an organization or as a private citizen. Single most important decision for Critical Data Protection
0 kommentar(er)
